๐Ÿฆ 

Outbreak Crisis Manager

Strategic Decision Game for Outbreak Control

Outbreak Response Education

๐ŸŽฏ Learning Outcomes

  • Analyze trade-offs between health, economy, trust, resources, and equity
  • Evaluate evidence quality for public health interventions
  • Apply regional context when selecting NPIs
  • Navigate competing stakeholder pressures
  • Assess equity impacts on vulnerable populations

๐Ÿ’ก Core Challenge

You'll manage a 6-round outbreak response, making critical NPI decisions under time pressure while balancing competing priorities in your unique regional context.

๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ The Five Regions

Each region has unique characteristics that fundamentally affect NPI effectiveness.

๐Ÿ™๏ธ Metro City

Dense urban core, diverse population, 40% essential workers

Pop: 2.3M โ€ข $2,030M

๐ŸŒพ Rural Valley

Farming communities, aging population, skeptical of government

Pop: 150K โ€ข $1,210M

๐ŸŒ‰ Border Town

60% immigrant, cross-border families, language barriers

Pop: 400K โ€ข $1,480M

๐ŸŽ“ University City

40% students, tech-savvy, party culture, activist traditions

Pop: 300K โ€ข $1,690M

โš“ Industrial Port

Blue-collar, union-strong, essential workers can't stop

Pop: 800K โ€ข $1,860M
โš ๏ธ
Regional Context is Critical

The same intervention can succeed brilliantly in one community while failing completely in another. Read your region's characteristics carefully!

๐Ÿ“ˆ The 6 Rounds

The outbreak evolves through distinct phases, each requiring different strategic priorities.

1
Unknown Pathogen
50 cases
2
Airborne Confirmed
2,650 cases
3
Healthcare Strain
12,000 cases
4
Peak Crisis
4,500/day
5
Fatigue Phase
1,500/day
6
Transition
380/day

โฑ๏ธ Timing Matters

Right intervention, wrong time = poor results. Early rounds prioritize health; later phases demand attention to economic sustainability and public trust. Some NPIs are most effective at specific phasesโ€”and can backfire if used too early or too late.

๐Ÿ“Š Scoring System: Five Metrics

โค๏ธ
Health
Disease control & healthcare capacity
max 1200
๐Ÿ“ˆ
Economy
Business continuity & employment
max 800
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Trust
Public confidence & cooperation
max 600
๐Ÿ”ง
Resources
Healthcare infrastructure & supplies
max 800
โš–๏ธ
Equity
Fair treatment of vulnerable populations
max 800

๐Ÿ“Œ Round Weightings

Each round emphasizes different priorities. Early rounds weight Health higher. Later rounds increase weights for Economy, Trust, and Equity.

โš ๏ธ Trade-offs Are Inevitable

Restrictive measures may boost Health but tank Economy and Trust. Every decision involves compromiseโ€”that's the challenge.

๐ŸŽฏ Critical Concept: Regional Modifiers

The scores you see on NPI cards are base values. Your actual outcome depends on how your region responds.

Your Actual Score = Base NPI Score + Regional Modifier

What you see on the card:

Example Intervention X

$80M
โค๏ธ +40 ๐Ÿ‘ฅ -10 โš–๏ธ +15

These are base valuesโ€”what happens under ideal conditions.

What actually happens:

Region A โ†’
Bonus applied!
Regional characteristics enhance effectiveness
Region B โ†’
Penalty applied!
Regional context creates resistance or barriers

๐Ÿ“ Regional Modifiers in Action

The same NPI can be a brilliant choice OR a disaster depending on regional context.

๐Ÿฅ

Healthcare Interventions

โœ“ May work well in regions with strong infrastructure
โœ— May face barriers in regions with geographic challenges or distrust
๐Ÿ“ฑ

Technology-Based NPIs

โœ“ May thrive where populations are tech-savvy
โœ— May fail where digital access is limited or surveillance is feared
๐Ÿ”’

Restrictive Measures

โœ— May devastate economies dependent on movement
โœ— May face resistance in regions valuing individual liberty

๐Ÿง  The Key Insight

Don't just look at the numbers on the card. Ask: "How will MY community respond to this intervention?"

๐Ÿ”ฌ Evidence Quality Matters

Each NPI has an evidence tier that affects its real-world effectiveness.

TIER 1
1.3ร—
Strong Evidence
Proven effective in multiple settings
TIER 2
1.0ร—
Moderate Evidence
Some studies support effectiveness
TIER 3
0.6ร—
Limited Evidence
Few studies, mixed results
TIER 4
0.1ร—
Poor Evidence
Experimental, may backfire
๐Ÿชค
Watch for "Trap" NPIs

Some NPIs look appealing but have poor evidence or are inappropriate for the current phase. Mass quarantine for 50 cases? Massive overreaction. Vector control for airborne transmission? Wrong disease model entirely.

๐ŸงŠ Beneath the Surface

This game has layers of complexity that aren't immediately visible. Here's what you should know:

โณ

Timing Matters

The same NPI can be highly effective in one round but counterproductive in another. What works early may backfire lateโ€”and vice versa.

๐Ÿ”—

Choices Have Consequences

Some decisions in early rounds affect what happens in later rounds. Investments (or neglect) in preparedness may come back to helpโ€”or hauntโ€”you.

๐Ÿ‘๏ธ

Not Everything Is Shown

Hidden modifiers, delayed effects, and context-dependent penalties operate beneath what you see on the cards. Read the briefings carefully.

๐ŸŽญ Crisis Events Are Dynamic

Regional crises may change NPI effectiveness, introduce additional costs, or create requirements you must meet to avoid penalties. Some effects persist across multiple rounds.

๐Ÿค” Question Your Assumptions

If an intervention seems obviously correct, pause. Consider: Is this the right phase? Does it fit my region? What am I not seeing? The game rewards strategic thinking over reflexive choices.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Budget & Crisis Events

Budget Management

  • Starting budget varies by region ($1,210M โ€“ $2,030M)
  • NPI costs are deducted immediately when selected
  • Some NPIs cost more in certain regions (logistics challenges)
  • โš ๏ธ Crisis events may affect NPI costs โ€” read the briefings carefully!
  • When budget exhausted: only FREE community alternatives available

๐Ÿ’ก Free Alternatives

Community-mobilized NPIs (volunteer networks, peer education) are FREE but have reduced effectiveness compared to funded programs.

๐Ÿšจ Crisis Events & Misinformation

Each round may bring regional challenges, misinformation campaigns requiring counter-spending, or opportunities with requirements attached. Stay alert!

Stakeholders & Coalitions

๐Ÿฅ

Medical Stakeholders

Healthcare professionals. Appreciate health-focused NPIs, resist economic-first approaches.

๐Ÿ’ผ

Economic Stakeholders

Business leaders. Support economic measures, oppose commerce restrictions.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ

Community Stakeholders

Civil society. Value engagement and equity, resist heavy-handed enforcement.

๐Ÿค Coalition Benefits

High stakeholder satisfaction unlocks bonuses. Low satisfaction triggers escalating consequencesโ€”from warnings to ultimatums that can reduce your effectiveness or even block certain NPIs.

๐Ÿ’ญ Prepare for Discussion

After gameplay, reflect on these questions:

Decision-Making

Which decisions were hardest? How did time pressure affect your choices?

Regional Context

How did your region's characteristics influence your NPI choices? What surprised you?

Trade-offs

What trade-offs between health, economy, trust, and equity were most challenging?

Mismatches

Which NPIs that seemed logical actually backfired in your region? What did this teach you?

Equity

How did your interventions affect vulnerable populations? Could you have achieved better outcomes?

Real-World Application

How would you apply these lessons to future outbreak preparedness?

๐ŸŽฎ

Ready to Play?

Remember: Context is everything.

๐Ÿ“–

Read your region carefully

๐Ÿ”ฌ

Check evidence quality

โš–๏ธ

Consider equity impacts

๐ŸŽฏ

Think strategically

Good luck, crisis managers! ๐Ÿš€

1 / 12
โ† โ†’ or Space to navigate